Facts Speak Louder? Comparing the attention effects of moral and factual framing of political issues

Logo poskytovatele

Varování

Publikace nespadá pod Ústav výpočetní techniky, ale pod Fakultu sociálních studií. Oficiální stránka publikace je na webu muni.cz.
Autoři

TÓTH Michal CELÝ Tadeáš CHYTILEK Roman

Rok publikování 2025
Druh Článek v odborném periodiku
Časopis / Zdroj ELECTORAL STUDIES
Fakulta / Pracoviště MU

Fakulta sociálních studií

Citace
www https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0261379425001027
Doi https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2025.102996
Klíčová slova Attention; Framing; Facts; Morality; Eye-tracking; Experiment
Přiložené soubory
Popis The media and political actors play a crucial role in shaping public attention, not only by selecting which issues to highlight but also by framing them in ways that influence public perception and engagement. Given the increasing prominence of moralized discourse in political communication, we examine whether moral framing is more effective in capturing public attention compared to factual framing, which relies on empirical evidence and rational argumentation. To examine this question, we conducted two preregistered experimental studies using different methods to measure attention: an eye-tracking experiment (N = 99) and a large-scale online survey (N = 1563). Participants were exposed to political issues that are not predominantly associated with either type of framing and were randomly assigned to conditions where the issues were framed either morally or factually. Our findings indicate that moral framing does not consistently attract more attention than factual framing. In fact, in some situations, factual frames were associated with slightly higher levels of audience attention. Understanding these dynamics is crucial in an age of information overload, when competition for public attention is intense and public debate is often dominated by emotional or value-driven messages. Additionally, our research contributes to ongoing debates about the implications of moral framing, particularly its potential to polarize audiences or divert attention from evidence-based decision-making.
Související projekty:

Používáte starou verzi internetového prohlížeče. Doporučujeme aktualizovat Váš prohlížeč na nejnovější verzi.

Další info