Bystanders’ responses to offline bullying and cyberbullying: The role of empathy and normative beliefs about aggression

Investor logo

Warning

This publication doesn't include Institute of Computer Science. It includes Faculty of Social Studies. Official publication website can be found on muni.cz.
Authors

MACHÁČKOVÁ Hana PFETSCH Jan

Year of publication 2016
Type Article in Periodical
Magazine / Source Scandinavian Journal of Psychology
MU Faculty or unit

Faculty of Social Studies

Citation
Web http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/sjop.12277/abstract
Doi http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/sjop.12277
Field Psychology
Keywords Offline bullying;cyberbullying;bystanders;empathy;normative beliefs about aggression
Attached files
Description Cyberbullying often takes place with the virtual presence or knowledge of bystanders. While we have some evidence about the determinants of bystanders’ responses to offline bullying, we lack empirical studies concerning the variables that influence bystanders’ responses to cyberbullying. The current study examines bystanders’ responses to offline bullying and cyberbullying incidents. Two types of responses were captured: support toward the victims and the reinforcement of bullies’ actions. Using data from 321 German adolescents (ages 12–18; M = 14.99; 44% girls), the association between bystanders’ responses and normative beliefs about verbal aggression and cyberaggression, and affective and cognitive empathy, were tested in a path model. Both types of normative beliefs positively predicted the reinforcement of bullies, and normative belief about verbal aggression also predicted support for the victims of offline bullying. Both types of empathy predicted support in offline bullying, but only affective empathy predicted support in cyberbullying. There was no link between affective or cognitive empathy to the reinforcement of bullies. Moreover, bystanders’ tendencies to respond supportively to the victim or to reinforce the bully were rather consistent in both cyber- and offline bullying, but there was no link between support and reinforcement. The findings are discussed with regard to implications for prevention and intervention efforts.
Related projects:

You are running an old browser version. We recommend updating your browser to its latest version.

More info