Proposal of a familial hypercholesterolemia paediatric diagnostic score (FH-PeDS)

Investor logo

Warning

This publication doesn't include Institute of Computer Science. It includes Faculty of Medicine. Official publication website can be found on muni.cz.
Authors

KAFOL Jan MIRANDA Beatriz SIKONJA Rok SIKONJA Jaka WIEGMAN Albert MEDEIROS Ana Margarida ALVES Ana Catarina FREIBERGER Tomáš HUTTEN Barbara A MLINARIC Matej BATTELINO Tadej HUMPHRIES Steve E BOURBON Mafalda GROSELJ Urh

Year of publication 2025
Type Article in Periodical
Magazine / Source EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE CARDIOLOGY
MU Faculty or unit

Faculty of Medicine

Citation
web https://academic.oup.com/eurjpc/advance-article/doi/10.1093/eurjpc/zwaf352/8169832?login=true
Doi https://doi.org/10.1093/eurjpc/zwaf352
Keywords Familial hypercholesterolemia; Diagnostic criteria; Detection; Machine learning model; Cardiovascular disease; Children
Attached files
Description Aims Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) significantly increases cardiovascular risk from childhood yet remains widely underdiagnosed. This cross-sectional study aimed to evaluate existing paediatric FH diagnostic criteria in real-world cohorts and to develop two novel diagnostic tools: a semi-quantitative scoring system (FH-PeDS) and a machine learning model (ML-FH-PeDS) to enhance early FH detection. Methods and results Five established FH diagnostic criteria were assessed (Dutch Lipid Clinics Network [DLCN], Simon Broome, EAS, Simplified Canadian, and Japanese Atherosclerosis Society) in Slovenian (N = 1360) and Portuguese (N = 340) paediatric hypercholesterolemia cohorts, using FH-causing variants as the reference standard. FH-PeDS was developed from the Slovenian cohort, and ML-FH-PeDS was trained and tested using a 60%/40% split before external validation in the Portuguese cohort. Only 47.4% of genetically confirmed FH cases were identified by all established criteria, while 10.9% were missed entirely. FH-PeDS outperformed DLCN in the combined cohort (AUC 0.897 vs. 0.857; P < 0.01). ML-FH-PeDS showed superior predictive power (AUC 0.932 in training, 0.904 in testing vs. 0.852 for DLCN; P < 0.01) and performed best as a confirmatory test in the testing subgroup (39.7% sensitivity, 87.7% PPV at 98% specificity). In the Portuguese cohort, ML-FH-PeDS maintained strong predictive performance (AUC 0.867 vs. 0.815 for DLCN; P < 0.01) despite population differences. Conclusion Current FH diagnostic criteria perform sub-optimally in children. FH-PeDS and ML-FH-PeDS provide tools to improve FH detection, particularly where genetic testing is limited. They also help guide genetic testing decisions for hypercholesterolemic children. By enabling earlier diagnosis and intervention, these tools may reduce long-term cardiovascular risk and improve outcomes.
Related projects:

You are running an old browser version. We recommend updating your browser to its latest version.

More info