The state of vigilance and not antiseizure medication dosage drive variability in interictal epilepsy biomarkers

Investor logo

Warning

This publication doesn't include Institute of Computer Science. It includes Faculty of Medicine. Official publication website can be found on muni.cz.
Authors

TRAVNICEK Vojtech MANSILLA Daniel ABDALLAH Chifaou PAIL Martin AVIGDOR Tamir DUBEAU Francois KLIMES Petr FRAUSCHER Birgit

Year of publication 2025
Type Article in Periodical
Magazine / Source Clinical Neurophysiology
MU Faculty or unit

Faculty of Medicine

Citation
web https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1388245725006777?via%3Dihub
Doi https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2025.2110825
Keywords iEEG; Epilepsy; Interictal biomarkers; Anti-seizure medication
Description Objective: During presurgical intracranial electroencephalography (iEEG) investigation, anti-seizure medication (ASM) is typically tapered to record seizures. Interictal biomarkers are critical for epileptogenic zone (EZ) localization. This study examines how ASM tapering and other confounding factors influence the rates and localization accuracy of interictal iEEG biomarkers. Methods: iEEG data from 19 patients were analyzed during two 24 h sections separated by at least seven days during > 10-day iEEG monitoring. ASM dosage, vigilance state, time of day, seizure proximity, and duration of monitoring were evaluated for their impact on interictal biomarker rates, spatial distribution and localization of the EZ. Results: Biomarker rates, spatial distributions, and EZ localization did not significantly differ between the two 24hour sections. The state of vigilance emerged as the most significant contributor explaining 22.7 % of the variability. Seizure proximity, time of day and ASM dosage contributed minimally, each accounting for <= 3.7 % of the variability. Conclusions: The state of vigilance is the most significant determinant of interictal biomarker variability, and exceeds the impact of all other confounding factors regarding biomarker rates, distribution, and EZ localization. Significance: These findings highlight the importance of vigilance state over ASM tapering, supporting the potential use of interictal biomarkers for EZ localization, regardless of ASM adjustments.
Related projects:

You are running an old browser version. We recommend updating your browser to its latest version.

More info