Effects of physiotherapy interventions for home-based rehabilitation on physical function after primary total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review protocol

Investor logo
Investor logo

Warning

This publication doesn't include Institute of Computer Science. It includes Faculty of Medicine. Official publication website can be found on muni.cz.
Authors

PRILL Robert KAYAALP Mahmut Enes KROLIKOWSKA Aleksandra BECKER Roland AYENI Olufemi LANGAUFOVÁ Alena KLUGAR Miloslav

Year of publication 2022
Type Article in Periodical
Magazine / Source JBI Evidence Synthesis
MU Faculty or unit

Faculty of Medicine

Citation
Web https://journals.lww.com/jbisrir/Fulltext/2022/12000/Effects_of_physiotherapy_interventions_for.9.aspx
Doi http://dx.doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-21-00355
Keywords fast track; knee replacement; outpatient; physical therapy; rehabilitation
Description Objective:The objective of this review is to provide a systematic and transparent overview of the effects of common physiotherapy techniques and exercises for the rehabilitation of patients following total knee arthroplasty. Introduction:Many protocols exist for the rehabilitation of patients after total knee arthroplasty, but there is a lack of systematic evidence on rehabilitation components, including precise exercise descriptions and their parameters. This review will fill in some of the gaps in reporting on scientific rehabilitation protocol components and the evaluation of their effectiveness. Inclusion criteria:We will include randomized controlled trials investigating active and passive physiotherapy techniques and exercises employed after primary total knee arthroplasty, and which report concrete parameters, such as dosage, duration, frequency, intensity, and function-related measurements. We will exclude other study types and randomized controlled trials reporting on techniques and exercises without precise descriptions. Methods:This review will aim to find both published and unpublished studies. The key information sources to be searched are MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase (Ovid), CINAHL (EBSCO), PEDro, Cochrane CENTRAL, ClinicalTrials.gov, and WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform. Two independent reviewers will screen titles, abstracts, and full texts; assess the methodological quality; and extract the data. We will perform narrative synthesis, followed by meta-analyses for pooled studies, where possible. Systematic review registration:PROSPERO CRD42022309185
Related projects:

You are running an old browser version. We recommend updating your browser to its latest version.

More info